Re: [webpages-l] vote to remove our pages from genealogy.com ?
Hmmm, I am not sure. Is it really best to have the pages removed right away? They will not be out of date for a while. Perhaps it would be more useful to leave them until the 21st so that people will at least find something? In the meantime we could publicize on s.g.g that people should change their links? Just a thought -- what do you think? Rick At 10:07 AM 12/3/98 +0100, D. Selig wrote:
"In the short term". Damit die Suchmaschinen es nicht merken und dann ins Verderben rennen.
...
Und wenn ihnen das bisher noch nicht klar war, dann ist es das spaetestens jetzt. ...
Wollen wir das ueberhaupt? Was sollen wir mit Seiten, auf die wir keinen Zugriff mehr haben? Ich bin nach wie vor fuer die Loeschung. Damit wir *jetzt* den Leuten sagen koennen, die Seiten auf genealogy.com gibt's nicht mehr. Ich moechte die Sudetenland Seiten geloescht haben und werde dies jetzt an Lloyds schreiben. Wolf hat es schon vor 2 Tagen beantragt; sie haben es NOCH NICHT DELETED!! Wollen wie es koordinieren, damit alles in /gene/-Baum geloescht wird? Gruss, Dora
On Thu, 3 Dec 1998, Richard Heli wrote:
Hmmm, I am not sure. Is it really best to have the pages removed right away? They will not be out of date for a while. Perhaps it would be more useful to leave them until the 21st so that people will at least find something? In the meantime we could publicize on s.g.g that people should change their links?
Just a thought -- what do you think?
I'm afraid most people who visit our pages are not on any mailing list and won't read any of our announcements anyway. If we wait until the 21st we just delay the problem and play Broderbund's cards. If we have our contents deleted now and inform the key sites (Cindy's list, Altavista etc.) about the change, we have the same gap of desinformation but not for Broderbund's profit. Arthur.Teschler@uni-giessen.de
participants (2)
-
Arthur Teschler
-
Richard Heli